Review exposes poor quality research on health, air pollution issues
Centre for Science and Environment draws attention to
the major findings of a new study conducted by Boston-based Health Effects Institute
(HEI). This first ever Asia-wide review of the scientific studies conducted on the health
effect of outdoor air pollution in Asian cities reaffirms that the effect of this scourge
is as lethal in Asia as observed in Europe and the US. The summary results in Asia
resemble the results previously reported by the large US and European multi-city studies.
This review further exposes wide differences in the capacities of the scientific community
across Asia to undertake quality research on air pollution and health.
New Delhi May 21, 2004: The Boston-based HEIs report, Health Effects of
Outdoor Air Pollution in Developing Countries of Asia: A Literature Review, recently
released in New Delhi, puts existing health studies on air pollution in Asia under the
scanner. In assessing existing evidence on the health toll of air pollution in Asian
cities, the report found that with an increase of just 10 microgramme per cum of PM10 -- a
key measure of pollution -- mortality increases by 0.5%, and with increased levels of
nitrogen dioxide, hospital respiratory admissions increases by 1%.
Given the high levels of air pollution in many Asian cities (exceeding 100
microgramme/cum), the public health impact could be substantial, the study warns.
This Asia-wide review, conducted under the Public Health and Air Pollution in Asia
Program (PAPA), was undertaken by HEI in partnership with the Clean Air Initiative for
Asian Cities (CAI Asia) to help inform regional policy makers about the state of the
science concerning air pollution and health in major Asian cities. Studies conducted in
India were also selected for this review.
Daniel Greenbaum, President of HEI said on this occasion, "This Review is the
first systematic identification of all peer reviewed Asian studies on the effects of air
pollution on health. This found a considerable body of science currently exists across
Asia, exceeding scientists expectations."
The review considered over 138 studies published between 1980 and 2003 that assessed
the extent of illness and deaths in China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Thailand,
Singapore and South Korea. Of these studies, only 28 qualified for further systematic
analysis, based on their ability to meet pre-specified quality criteria. These included
meeting a minimum data collection period of one year, use of statistical approaches to
control for non-air pollution factors that could potentially affect the study outcome, and
reporting in a manner that allows coherent comparison of approaches and results across
cities.
Contd
.
It is disquieting to note that out of 15 Indian studies considered for review 6
from Mumbai, 5 from Delhi and 4 from other Indian cities, only one study on India,
conducted by the World Bank, could meet the criteria for inclusion in the analysis.
Although Indian studies have generated important local evidence, these are still much
limited in scope, scale and method.
The Asian studies that qualified for inclusion however displayed almost the same
pattern in the health impact being associated with the increase in air pollution, as
observed in US and Europe.
HEI scientists were surprised by these similarities. They had good reasons to expect,
as the report states, that the effects of air pollution would be influenced by the
difference in age profile, health status and lifestyle between Asian and western
populations, and also by the mixture and toxicity of pollutants. But studies reviewed so
far in Asia do not show much variation from those observed elsewhere. Explains HEI vice
president, Robert O Keefe, "The small number of cities considered for review limited
the comparisons that can be made at this stage of analysis, but the estimated effects are
similar to those found in the extensive studies conducted in western countries."
A key challenge for this analysis was that the majority of the Asian studies that could
fulfill the criteria for the review are concentrated in the more developed regions of East
Asia. Most studies were from South Korea 11, followed by China 6 and Hong
Kong 6, while the review included one study each from Taiwan, India, Singapore,
Thailand, and Japan.
As a result, the findings are more influenced by the East Asian conditions and do not
represent the full range of Asian settings. What the study cannot adequately capture at
this stage therefore, is the influence of several unique features of Asia, such as the
implication of very high levels of air pollution in South Asia (as compared to those in
the US and Europe), and the susceptibility of poorer people to high levels of air
pollution, an endemic problem in many Asian cities.
Many of these issues will be addressed in the new studies that have recently been
initiated in Bangkok, Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Wuhan in China under this programme.
Similar studies in India, and Southeast Asia are slated to begin in 2005. These studies
are being designed to build Asian scientific and technical capacities to undertake these
analyses.
In response to the findings of this report, CSE strongly urges the Indian government to
immediately strengthen policy support to scientists in India, and to develop the
countrys scientific capacities to be able to better assess the magnitude of risks
from air pollution. This is urgently needed for better informed and guided policy to
combat the air pollution crisis in the region.
More information at: http://www.healtheffects.org |