NOXious trail
Over the last few weeks we were inundated with queries from the media. The air quality
data produced by the apex air quality monitoring body in the country - the Central
Pollution Control Board (CPCB) shows NOx levels in Delhi rising dramatically. Why? We were
equally curious - has CPCB explained the reasons? According to media reports, the CPCB is
blaming the CNG programme in Delhi for the rise in NOx levels.
We checked with CPCB whether any study was conducted to establish the basis of their
claim. CPCB said no. This was a mere hypotheses based on what is generally known about the
potential of CNG vehicles to emit high Nox, if NOT maintained properly. Such a glib
explanation spurred us to get to the basics - what is the pattern in NOx levels in the
city. We scanned the time series data for seven monitoring stations in the city. And we
were in for a few surprises:
The average annual NOx levels have
begun to surpass the standards in one station in Delhi - the busy traffic intersection of
ITO, and that too since 1997. During 1997 and 2001, the levels have hovered between 59
microgramme per cum to 63 microgramme per cum, as against the annual average standard of
60 microgramme per cum. During the last two years -- 2002 and 2003, the annual average
levels are comparatively higher - 74 and 94 microgramme per cum, respectively.
A detailed traffic survey conducted by
the Transportation Research and Injury Prevention Programme of the Indian Institute of
Technology, Delhi, show that among five major traffic intersections surveyed in Delhi
during 2002, the ITO intersection had much higher traffic volumes and density during
different peak times of the day. Two-wheelers and cars together dominated the traffic
volume, from 53 per cent to 70 per cent. The heavy-duty commercial vehicles including
buses formed 5 to 14 per cent.
Is the rise in NOx levels similar to
the ITO trend in the other six monitoring sites in Delhi? No. In all other sites during
1997 - 2002, the lowest average level reported was 19.4 microgramme per cum, while the
highest average reported was around 39 microgramme per cum, but never above the standard.
CPCB data also shows that other Indian
cities, including Kolkata and Pune, have crossed the NOx standards consistently over the
last couple of years. There are more questions still. But at least the pattern is clear to
us. Though the NOx levels are low, it is possible to detect a steady rise over time.
But after one careless remark - that the increase in NOx in Delhi could be due to the CNG
programme - the authorities once again are lulled into complacency.
And that makes us angry. Why is NOx increasing and how do we deal with it? NOx may prove
extremely difficult to control in the future. The word of caution going around globally is
that unlike other air pollutants, which follow the simple processes of emission,
concentration, dispersion and deposition, nitrogen oxides have a more complex life cycle.
NOx also triggers formation of more harmful pollutants, such as ozone. The mention of
ozone opens up yet another Pandora's box. Ozone has not as yet been assessed adequately
and in Delhi is only monitored in the high-traffic ITO intersection, which records very
low levels. Naturally, high levels of NOx will first trigger ozone, but later, react with
this pollutant to mop it up.
Therefore ozone monitoring should be expanded immediately to include more representative
areas of the city. For most effective results, both hydrocarbons and NOx will have to be
controlled effectively, and simultaneously, to prevent an ozone catastrophe.
But what gripped our attention is the 'inadvertent' leak -- a recent monitoring at a
downwind residential site in Delhi has exposed high ozone concentrations, which CPCB has
not yet made public. Our air quality regulators
refuse to acknowledge the looming air pollution challenge. While particulate levels are
still high, NOx has begun to rise, too. But there is still no policy recognition of the
dire consequences of the city getting caught in the crippling grip of the NOx-PM trade
off. The problem of NOx emissions is linked with improved technology. All new technology
solutions to particulate, carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions today are traded for
higher NOx emissions. Engineering and technological solutions to reduce one only increases
the other. The trend in Delhi only reconfirms what the industrialised North has already
witnessed. For instance, while the US has seen a dramatic decline in PM, CO and HC
emissions between 1970 and 2000, NOx emissions have increased by 20 per cent during the
same time. This has spurred the US to move towards the most stringent fuel-neutral
emissions standards of this decade.
It is therefore baffling why our regulators show such
complete lack of insight into Delhi's experience. NOx level rise in Delhi coincides with
the implementation of the CNG programme, higher penetration of new diesel vehicles, and
much deeper penetration of four-stroke two-wheelers. Unstable NOx emissions from poorly
maintained CNG fleet are suspect.
The phenomenal spurt in diesel vehicles sales over the
last four years are also suspect, as they are legally allowed to emit higher NOx than
petrol vehicles. Four stroke engines that form nearly 80 per cent of the new two-wheeler
sales in the city are also expected to have higher NOx levels than two-stroke engines.
Where is the blueprint for action to monitor the impact of these developments and design a
NOx control strategy?
Instead of being so eloquent with superficial judgments on the local air quality
situation, the regulators need to spruce up their monitoring capacity to be able to track
changes and act on them. NOx and particulates are a serious challenge today. Include their
measurements in the vehicle inspection programme for the in-use fleet, even as new
standards are tightened. There is no reason why CNG vehicles cannot maintain their low
emitting characteristics with disciplined, preventive maintenance.
Regulators also shy away from engaging in debates on why any fuel should be allowed the
leniency to emit more NOx and PM, as is done in the case of diesel vehicles, which also
give them a competitive edge in the market? They are content with inheriting the
inconsistency of the European standards that are still not fuel-neutral. Similarly, the
government refuses to separate out the hydrocarbon and NOx emissions standards
for two-wheelers. Combined standards allow both two- and four-stroke vehicles a generous
margin to emit more hydrocarbon and NOx, respectively. Make separate and stringent
hydrocarbon and NOx emission standards for all two-wheelers to settle the trade-off
between two-stroke and four-stroke.
Raising alarm is easier than finding solutions. Let us be clear -- achieving the very low
levels of NOx, PM and toxins - which all categories of vehicles will need to meet in the
future - presents a very serious challenge to air quality regulators and the vehicle
industry. Acknowledge it and act on it, but don't just look for a whipping boy.
-- Anumita Roychowdhury
Right To Clean Air Campaign |