The Centre for
Science and Environment (CSE) rejects the interim report of the Mashelkar committee on
auto fuel policy saying it is weak and visionless. The report, if accepted, as the Union
minister for petroleum and natural gas seems desperate to do, will only maintain status
quo and condemn millions of urban Indians to slow murder. The report, which plays into the
hands of the polluters will be used to destroy the Supreme Courts initiative to
protect public health in the capital says CSE.
NEW DELHI, JANUARY 8, 2002: The Centre for Science and Environment
(CSE) is deeply disappointed that the interim report of the committee on auto fuel policy
headed by the CSIR chief R A Mashelkar has played into the hands of polluters. The report,
which lays down a road map for automobile fuel standards, is so weak and uncaring about
public health objectives that it virtually denies millions of urban Indians the right to
clean air. According to the committee, "clean" fuel (meeting Euro II norms) that
is currently being supplied to Delhi and has had little impact on its overall air
quality, will be supplied to the rest of the country only in 2005. People of Delhi have
been given no option but to die a slow death as nothing new is proposed for them.
The Committees road map even dilutes the recommendations of:
- The Inter-Ministerial Task Force on fuel quality and vehicular emission specifications,
which submitted its report to the government in March 2001. The task force report
had mentioned that, by 2005, the preferred option would be to achieve Euro IV standards,
but the "next best option would be to achieve Euro III norms with 50 ppm sulphur
diesel in six major cities" by 2005.
- The road map of the Society for Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) presented in
2000, commits industry to meet Euro III and Euro IV emissions standards in 2004 and 2007
respectively and Euro IV for commercial vehicles in 2008. Mashelkar wants industry to
relax and keep polluting.
"It is no wonder that the first people to applaud the Mashelkar
report were the transporters lobby and the minister for petroleum and natural
gas" says Sunita Narain, director Centre for Science and Environment addressing a
press conference today. Narain added, "It is shocking that the committees
recommendations, supposedly taking into account public health, are even weaker than the
automobile industrys own road map, even though the industry only has profit in
mind."
CSE believes that the desperate and shameless rush with which the
Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas, Ram Naik, has not only accepted the
committees interim report as final but has decided to take it to the Cabinet for
approval, shows that the committee was set up with a single point objective: to undermine
the Supreme Court initiative aimed at bringing in clean technology to advance norms and
protect public health in Delhi. The committee has literally played in the hands of the
government and the petroleum industry to scuttle the move to phase in CNG in the capital
under the pretext that only emissions standards need to be prescribed instead of
technology. Give consumer a choice of technology, thats all it says, but certainly
not the right to clean air.
While condemning the report Anumita Roychowdhury Coordinator of
CSEs Right to Clean Air Campaign said "Dr Mashelkar has failed the people of
Delhi by not giving us a bold road map to clean fuel and automobile emission standards.
The purpose is to meet air quality standards and there is nothing in the report to suggest
how these recommendations are going to help to even inch towards cleaning up the air. His
road map will not even begin to make any difference to the air quality in Delhi as it
simply says that we will have to accept the fuel, which is currently being used in Delhi.
And worse, it will even destroy the small gains made so far -- arresting of the run away
pollution since 1998. This year winter pollution is much worse because we have failed to
implement the CNG order."
Narain is incensed at the way Dr Mashelkar has given Ram Naik and the
Delhi transport minister Ajay Maken a reason to rejoice by legitimising that nothing more
needs to be done in Delhi for a long time as it has already implemented Euro II emissions
standards. Mashelkar ignores that the Euro II emissions standards are in force in Delhi
because of the stick from the Supreme Court. Apart from a few dismissive lines on the
civil societys demand for a leapfrogging strategy, he has no stated plan to make it
happen.
It is therefore grossly inappropriate for him to even suggest at this
time that, "the government should decide only the vehicular emissions standard and
the corresponding fuel specifications without specifying vehicle technology and the fuel
type." What else has the government been doing since 1991, with absolutely no impact?
It is because the civil society has had no confidence in the official norm setting process
to either push technology or to meet air quality targets the Supreme Court in Delhi have
had to intervene. The Supreme Court has already had to advance the emission norms
prescribed by the government by over five years. It became necessary to stipulate clean
technology such as CNG to overcome the limitation that diesel technology posed to
achieving emissions levels beyond the weak norms in force. CNG vehicles meet Euro IV norms
in terms of particulate emissions giving people of Delhi a tremendous advantage over what
Mashelkar committee has recommended.
Despite noting at the outset that "public health is a prime
concern", the report offers nothing to address this concern. Even in 2005 diesel will
have sulphur content as high as 350 ppm with no cap on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAH) that makes diesel fume such a strong carcinogen. Petrol will be rich in aromatic
content that is extremely toxic. Indiscriminate use of unsafe oxygenates like MTBE will
continue.
"It is a farce to even talk about letting emissions standards
govern when we do not even have a legally enforceable system to ensure compliance with the
regional air quality targets," says Narain. She cites the recent case in Maryland,
USA, where federal grants were cut as the state had failed to meet the air quality target.
In the US, the federal clean air act specifies that if regional air quality targets are
not met, the states can lose federal highway funds. Monetary penalties and fear of court
action keep the states in line. "It is meaningless to talk about emissions standards
and air quality objectives without a legally enforceable compliance clause" says
Narain.
The CSE strongly demands a public debate on the interim report before
it is finalised. Till then the government should be prevented from passing off this
extremely dubious and weak document as policy.
For further details contact: Right to Clean Air
Team at Tel: +91 (011)-29955124, 29955125, 29956394, 29956401, 29956399 29956110 |