|
PESTICIDES IN BOTTLED WATER & SOFT DRINKS: CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
In
February, we released a study on pesticide residues in bottled water. We received a large
number of letters, e-mails and messages from across the country asking us, if what we had
found in bottled water was correct, then what about soft drinks? Tests
carried out by CSE's Pollution Monitoring Laboratory found deadly insecticides in 12
leading brands of cold drinks. The
CSE exposé has generated tremendous media and public interest. Here is a day-to-day
update on media coverage, government reactions and industry response
|
FEBRUARY 7, 2004 |
The
Tribune reports that the National Akali Dal has sought action against
cola companies and has raised queries on why what the government
intend to do with the JPC report.
|
FEBRUARY 4, 2004
|
JPC report confirms that soft drinks sold in India by US beverage giants Coca-Cola and Pepsi contained pesticide residue, rejects adoption of European Union (EU) norms, instead suggesting setting up of standards that are best suited for Indian conditions. The report reasons that the EU norms were not based on any toxicological criteria or any realistic basis, but were a surrogate for zero. JPC recommends that the Centre frames its own science-based food standards, in keeping with internationally-acceptable norms, to protect public health. JPC also upholds cola companies’ plea that they cannot be held responsible for failure on the part of their franchisees. The news finds coverage in all media, in India and abroad.
|
JANUARY 31, 2004 |
Meanwhile, Business Line reported that the JPC report mentions that
PepsiCo had not signed stipulated agreements with the Standard International Bottlers Agreement (SIBA), stating that the franchisee
bottlers are liable for their business and that PepsiCo has no responsibility in respect thereof.
|
JANUARY 30, 2004
|
The Hindustan Times reports that the JPC may propose strict norms for cola companies, while the Financial Express has said that the JPC has recommended adoption of highest norms for the ‘water’ that is used in making of carbonated soft drinks and not the ‘finished product’.
|
JANUARY 29, 2004 |
According to Business Line, highly-placed sources in the JPC have said that the report has suggested to the Government a set of fresh norms for soft drinks as finished products. Norms have conventionally been set for water as an ingredient in soft drinks, and not for finished products.
|
JANUARY 29, 2004 |
The Pioneer reported that the JPC is divided over whether it should accept the CSE report "in
toto".
|
JANUARY 29, 2004 |
Meanwhile, The Indian Express has said that the JPC has upheld CSE's findings that colas ontained dangerous levels of pesticides and has asked the Government to set norms "at the earliest" for "finished cola drinks."
|
JANUARY 28, 2004 |
Newspapers announce that JPC, headed by Sharad Pawar, will table its final report in Parliament on February 4.
|
JANUARY 17, 2004 |
The Economic Times reports that MPs want to summon Sushma Swaraj before the
JPC.
|
JANUARY 17, 2004 |
Meanwhile, newspapers report that the JPC report will be dated by the end of January.
|
JANUARY 14, 2004
|
The Financial Express reports a new bone of contention in the cola controversy - the crucial and existing caffeine standard for soft drinks in the country. MPs belonging to the JPC have asked CSE to research the issue.
|
JANUARY 12, 2004
|
Business Line reports that the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has clamped down on production of some bottled water plants on account of the manufacturers either failing to submit test reports on revised pesticide norms or unsatisfactory performance, as the companies involved are claiming otherwise.
|
JANUARY 10, 2004
|
The Hindu
reports on the Down To Earth cover story on laxitiy in fixing pesticides safety standards for other food articles.
|
JANUARY 9, 2004
|
According to
The Indian Express, the Government came out with a draft notification setting European Union standards for drinking water for all beverages, including carbonated drinks, fruit juices and tea and coffee. As an after-thought, the Ministry of Health wants to have EU standards
for only carbonated drinks, and exclude all other products including fruit and vegetable juices.
|
JANUARY 1, 2004
|
The Tribune reports that new norms for bottled water are being implemented from January 1.
|
DECEMBER 31, 2003
|
As an annual roundup, a number of newspapers cover the CSE expose on pesticides in bottled water and soft drinks.
|
DECEMBER 18, 2003
|
The Pioneer reports that PepsiCo and Coca Cola representatives deposed before the
JPC.
|
DECEMBER 17, 2003
|
The Indian Express reports that Pepsi has withdrawn a plea against CSE, saying it had full faith in the
JPC.
|
November
18, 2003 |
The Financial Express reports
that Bureau of Indian Standards will implement EU norms for bottled drinking water and
mineral water from January 1, 2004.
|
October 31,
2003 |
Curious about the spurious: CPCB
tests soft drink samples, but simply out of curiosity because testing samples
is not its job, says a Times of India article.
|
October 29,
2003 |
The Indian Express report
uncovers a 1993 ICMR report and the governments monumental callousness in shelving
its findings. Damaging revelations on food contamination. The Economic Times article says
Pepsi and Coke have expressed their wish to depose before the JPC. The Indian Express
reports government agencies have claimed before the JPC that they have no mandate to check
groundwater quality as this is a state subject, the Indian Express reports.
|
October 22,
2003 |
According to The Hindu,
JPC grills government labs: CFTRI and CFL both find no faults with CSEs methodology.
Curiously, in routine tests done before the CSE report came out, the labs did not find any
pesticide residues; but residues were found in tests after the report. Another Hindu
article says JPC raised its eyebrows at ads depicting soft drinks as safe, and was mulling
over calling Sushma Swaraj to depose, and decides to visit Plachimada.
|
October 21,
2003 |
The Tribune, The Financial
Express and The Statesman report the JPCs meeting with representatives of
FICCI, CII and ASSOCHAM. The reiterated the industrys plea to adopt national norms
based on Indian conditions and ground realities instead of EU norms. They said EU norms
were impractical and would affect the domestic agriculture, food industry and exports.
Sharad Pawar said even though they were open to hearing the two cola companies they had
not expressed any wish to depose before the JPC. HE also said that they would be visiting
the Mysore and Kolkata laboratories and the Coca-Cola plant in Plachimada where a popular
agitation is going on against the over use ground water. The JPC has also decided to ask
the Union health minister Sushma Swaraj to depose before it.
|
October 20,
2003 |
JPC today questioned the government
accredited laboratories, CFTRI and CFL as to why pesticide residues were not detected in
soft drinks before the CSE published its report, whereas the labs found pesticides in the
samples sent by the health ministry. Officials of the two labs told the JPC that they were
not the same samples as that tested by CSE. JPC Chair, Sharad Pawar, told The Free
Press Journal, Deccan Chronicle, The Indian Express and Deccan Herald
that it had the option of calling CSE again for further clarifications. JPC will also
see what powers it had to act against the advertisements of the soft drinks claiming they
were safe, even though the JPC was looking into the issue. It may also visit the bottling
plants of both Coca-Cola and Pepsi, from where samples maybe taken and tested
independently before the verdict is given.
|
October 20,
2003 |
According to coverage in The Pioneer,
the Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore (CFTRI), and the Central Food
Laboratory, Kolkata (CFL), have said there is no reason to doubt the methodology used by
CSE to detect pesticides. The two labs told the JPC that the CSE had used standard
methodology to detect pesticide residues.
|
October 16,
2003 |
Coca-Cola told the US regulator
Securities Exchange Commission that the allegations of pesticide residues in its soft
drinks by CSE were false, the Business Standard reported. It however admitted that
the allegations had adversely affected its sales in July-September. In addition, poor
demand in Japan caused Asia sales to grow only by one per cent as compare to 9 per cent in
the corresponding quarter of last year.
|
October 10,
2003 |
CSE deposes before the Joint
Parliamentary Committee, which was widely covered by Business Standard, The
Indian Express, Deccan Herald. In its presentation, CSE said that in addition
to pesticides in soft drinks, their dangerous levels in food and water is an area of
concern. The bottled water used in the soft drinks was not regulated and there was a need
for a stringent policy for the safe use of pesticides. CSE Director Sunita Narain
suggested prescribing different standards for nutritional products like milk and fruit
juices and non-nutritional products like soft drinks. Chairman Sharad Pawar said that the
CSE presentation was impressive, but the veracity of the report has to be
analyzed by experts. He also said that the JPC had requested the Lok Sabha Speaker for
three experts, as the reports were too technical. The JPC also expressed doubts over the
report being tabled in the winter session.
|
October 9,
2003 |
Representatives of the Ministries of
health, food processing, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and the Agriculture and
Processed Food Products Export Development Authority deposed before the JPC, according to
coverage in Business Line and The Hindu. The Health ministry was queried on
the reason for issuing draft pesticide residue norms for packaged beverages and whether
the ministry had consulted World Health Organization and Codex norms. JPC Chair Sharad
Pawar was quoted as saying that the health ministry had not consulted any of the advisory
groups that it should have before issuing the draft notification. He also said that food
processing ministry and the APEDA said that EU norms applied in India would affect the
farmers and the food processing industry. They said a large number of units in the country
will not be able to meet the stringent norms and this will also affect the exports of
processed food products. Meanwhile the health ministry has deferred its notification on
revised norms for pesticides residues till the end of December.
|
October 3,
2003 |
Union minister for food processing N T
Shanmuhgam goes on another inspection of a bottler, Varun beverages, in Koshi Kalan, Uttar
Pradesh. Two bottles of Pepsi manufactured in 1995 and 1996 are seized as they do not have
the declaration contains no fruit juice, violating the Fruit Products Order 1955, an
article in The Financial Express reports.
|
October 1,
2003 |
According to reports in Central
Chronicle and Business Line, the Delhi high court stayed the government
notification requiring companies to print their manufacturing date, best before date, and
contains no fruit declaration on the body of the glass bottles than on the caps. Hindustan
Coca-Cola beverages, along with its bottlers and shareholders, had petitioned the high
court seeking to refrain the authorities from taking steps to compel them to destroy the
existing stocks of empty bottles, pleading for more time to phase out the old stock.Meanwhile,
an article Business Line reports that the beverage industry has started a
misinformation campaign claiming that the draft notification of the health ministry, which
applies EU norms for water on finished products, will have several implications, and that
most products in India will not be able to meet these tough standards. The Cola majors
also claim that these standards will be tough to follow and legalizing them in India would
be unprecedented and counter to international norms.
|
September
30, 2003 |
The Indian Express and the New
Indian Express reported that many shops in Chennai were selling bottles of soft drinks
that had long crossed the best before use date by offering huge discounts. The two litre
bottles, which normally cost Rs 40 were being sold for Rs 15 and even below. Meanwhile, Business
Standard reports Pepsi Co claims that the consumer confidence is returning, with sales
returning to pre-controversy levels. Media reports say that sales fallen 30 per cent after
the CSE report.
|
September
22, 2003 |
The Delhi High Court deferred the
hearing on the petition filed by PepsiCo India challenging CSEs report that soft
drinks had pesticide residues, according to a Business Line article. The hearing
has been deferred till October 28 as both Pepsi and CSE wanted more time to file their
replies.
|
September
21, 2003 |
The Hindu reports Union
minister of state for food processing inspected the various sections of the Pepsi soft
drinks plant at Mamandoor in Kancheepuram district for nearly two hours. He said he had
taken samples of various Pepsi drinks and sent them for testing at Chennai and Mysore
laboratories.
|
September
19, 2003 |
According to The Financial Express,
the government is planning to get an independent evaluation of Coke and Pepsi plants
in the vicinity of the Yamuna River in Delhi to check if these units are causing any
adverse environmental impact. The issue was discussed with the companies after it was
alleged that sludge from plants in Kerala had toxins that could affect human health.
|
September
17, 2003 |
The Delhi High Court has stayed the
governments decision to destroy empty glass bottles of Coca-Cola not having the
mandatory embossed declaration "sweetened aerated water, contains no fruit
juice". According to The Economic Times, the court issued notice to the
ministry of food processing industries to reply to the companys allegations that
governments direction to destroy empty glass bottles lying segregated in various
plants in the country is illegal.
|
September
16, 2003 |
The Indian Express, The Asian Age,
Business Standard covered the first meeting of the Joint Parliamentary Committee. The
JPC decided to involve experts to study the issue and invited suggestions from NGOs,
industry representatives, farmers, medical professionals, and toxicologists and any other
interested party. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research chief Dr R A Mashelkar
made a presentation to the JPC giving an overview of the issue. The JPC members also
witnessed the presentations of the scientists from the CFTRI and the CFL. Speaking to
reporters, the chairman of the JPC said that it would request the Speaker formally for
three experts: G Thyagarajan, N K Agnihotri, and S K Khanna. The next meeting was
scheduled for October 9. The committee members also raised objections to the health
ministry draft notification, which had set stringent standards for fruit juices and cost
drinks. The committee said that the health ministry notification be kept aside till the
JPC had formulated its own view on the issue.
|
September
15, 2003 |
The government is planning to make
statutory warning mandatory for all soft drinks producers. An article in The Economic
Times reports that the warning will have information on caffeine and number of
calories the drink carries. Diet Coke and Pepsi will have a warning that it is not safe
for children. According to the ministry for food processing, the draft notification is
ready.
|
September
12, 2003 |
Avtar Singh Bhadhana, a Lok Sabha MP
and a member of the Joint Parliamentary Committee, has served a legal notice to the
Coca-Cola and Pepsi offices in India and their headquarters. He has asked them to
immediately stop their sales in India or else face a $10 billion suit on grounds of
causing health hazards.
|
September
10, 2003 |
A Deccan Chronicle report says
that the Andhra Pradesh government under pressure from the cola giants, has moderated its
pace on laboratory tests of soft drinks samples collected from various parts of the state.
It has directed the Institute of Preventive Medicine to collect samples of soft drinks of
both Coca-Cola and Pepsi and test them for chemical, biological, bacteriological and
pesticide residues. But the tests are yet to start even a month after the samples had been
collected.
|
September 5,
2003 |
The
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) raided a Delhi plant of bottled water that was picking up
bottles of branded water, filling them with water and selling them under fake ISI mark of
quality. Although fake bottling plants were previously reported, in Kanpur and Pun, BIS is
only now realizing how widespread the problem is. According to The Times of India,
Union food and consumer affairs minister Sharad Yadav ordered the BIS to conduct raids in
various parts of the country to prevent further misuseMeanwhile, Business Line reports
that Coca-Cola in a press release said that the Gujarat government has cleared 17 samples
of Coca-Cola taken from various parts of the state, after they tested negative for
pesticides like Lindane, Chlorpyrifos, and DDT. The samples were tested at the Food and
Drugs Laboratory in Vadodara.
|
September 4,
2003 |
Maharashtra Food And Drug Administration has decided to forward its report on tests
conducted on soft drinks to determine pesticide residues to the Joint Parliamentary
Committee, The Free Press Journal reported. The minister Anil Deshmukh said that
the results had been received and they show variable percentage of pesticide residues in
the products, with Pepsi containing Lindane above global norms.Meanwhile, Kolkata mayor
Subrata Mukherjee will sue the Diamond Beverages for publishing the Kolkata Municipal
Corporation report clearing the soft drinks samples tested by it, The Statesman reports.
Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1956, the test report of any beverage or
food cannot be published by the authority against which charges are brought.
|
September 3,
2003 |
Newstime reports that samples of Coca-Cola and Pepsi tested at the Vimta laboratory
had pesticides below detectable limits, according to the Hyderabad-based Medically Aware
and Responsible Citizens of Hyderabad (MARCH). Its chairman, Dr Bhargava, however, also
said that 75-100 samples tested across the country by NGOs and the Union government were
enough to order the two soft drinks majors to pack their bags. With the norms for
bottled water becoming effective from January 1, 2004, all food testing laboratories will
also have to upgrade their testing facilities to meet European standards on bottled water
and beverages. Laboratory officials are expecting a rise in their costs that can go up to
crores or rupees. The 34 food testing laboratories under the ministry of science and
technology and accredited to the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration
Laboratories will have to upgrade, according to The Statesman.
|
September 1,
2003 |
An
article in The Telegraph reports on the cracks in the unity between the two soft
drinks majors. The Delhi high court restrained Coca-Cola from airing its ad campaign
featuring Salman Khan, saying they were intended to depict Pepsi as inferior. The court
however refused to admit Pepsis plea that the use of an object similar to its logo
in the Coca-Cola ad amounted to an infringement of the trademark and copyright law. Coke
and Pepsi officials were called by the West Bengal Environment Ministry, The Statesman
reported. Environment minister Manab Mukherjee informed the chief minister that he was not
satisfied by the responses of the companies on the presence of lead and cadmium in the
sludge collected from a bottling plant at Diamond Harbour Road. The companies had been
given 10 days time to clarify, but their reply was not satisfactory.
|
AUGUST
30, 2003 |
According
to reports in The Financial Express, The Pioneer, The Assam Tribune,
and The Times of India, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has issued
a draft amendment notification of the Prevention of Food Adulteration rules of 1955, dated
August 26, to regulate the presence of metals, and pesticides in beverages, fish and other
food products. It proposes to extend the norms for pesticide residues in bottled water to
all kinds of beverages including soft drinks. 30 days have been given for objections or
suggestion before a confirmatory is issued.Meanwhile, reports in The Tribune, The
New Indian Express, The Hindu note that the Central Science Laboratory in Britain has
found soft drinks safe for human consumption after testing two bottles each of Coca-Cola
and Pepsi. The lab said that out of the 35 pesticides tested, it did not find traces of 31
at or above the EU norms. The tests were commissioned by the newsmagazine Outlook, which
picked up samples from the Safdarjung Enclave area of South Delhi. Coca-Coal India claimed
that it had got a clean chit from the laboratory.
In another development, The Statesman reports that the green bench of the
Kolkata high court heard two separate petitions for banning the sales of the soft drinks.
One of the petitioners, Subhas Dutta said that the ingredients of these soft drinks namely
caffeine, phosphorus, and excess sugar were hazardous and were not known to the consumers.
The court has directed its office to issue notices to the respondents.
|
AUGUST
29, 2003 |
The green
bench of the Kolkata High Court admitted a public interest litigation to demanding the
state pollution control board to make public test results of the soft drinks samples
analyzed for toxins. Both the board and the environment minister had said that their
reports would not be disclosed, but sent to the Centre and the state health department.
|
AUGUST
28, 2003 |
Hindustan
Times reports that the test results of the Central Food Technological Research
Institute (CFTRI), Mysore, and the Central Food Laboratory (CFL), Kolkata were made
public. The tests revealed that the samples of both Coke and Pepsi contained levels of
pesticides like Lindane and DDT that were higher than permissible EU norms. DDT was 12
times higher than the EU norms in 58 per cent of the samples. Lindane was found in all the
samples and was higher than EU norms in 33 per cent of the samples. Chlorpyrifos was also
found in all the samples and exceeded EU norms in 75 per cent samples. Blue Pepsi had
pesticide residues 5.2 times higher than the EU standards, the highest levels in all
samples of all brands. While Pepsi, Diet Pepsi and Limca cleared the EU bar. The labs in a
joint report also said that since the samples tested by them were not from the same batch
as CSE samples, the two reports were not comparable.
|
AUGUST
27, 2003 |
The
Financial Express reports that the Union Ministry for Health and Family Welfare have
decided to promulgate an ordinance to categorise water as a food item and fix enforceable
safety standards for drinking water under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The
proposal will be put before the Union cabinet for approval. This will mean that all
agencies responsible for providing drinking water will have to adhere to these norms.
Health Minister Sushma Swaraj also said that the detailed reports of the test results of
the 12 brands of soft drinks would be made public tomorrow.Meanwhile in Rajasthan, a
petitioner has challenged the test results of the samples tested by the State Central
Public Health Laboratory, Jaipur, which shows no microbial contamination.
|
AUGUST
27, 2003 |
The Nepal
government announced that the Coca-Cola and Pepsi samples tested for pesticide residues
are within safety levels for consumption, the Kathmandu Post reported.
|
AUGUST
25, 2003 |
The Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare seeks an "unconditional apology" from Pepsi, after the company used the
Health minister Sushma Swarajs name in an advertisement claiming that the minister
had given a clean to Pepsi. The advertisement had quoted the minister as saying "all
these (soft drinks) are well within safety limits".The Mumbai High Court sets
aside an order by the Maharashtra Food and Drugs Administration prohibiting the sales and
purchase of a batch of soft drinks from the Pune plant of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages,
saying that the product confirmed to the standards set by the PFA Rules 1955. This order
was issued after the court received the public analysts reports of seven samples of
Coke, Limca, Thums Up and Sprite, which had pesticide residues below European standards.
|
AUGUST
25, 2003 |
A public interest litigation was filed suo
moto in the Supreme Court (SC) today on behalf of the Centre for Science and
Environment (CSE). The SC issued notices to the Union ministries of Food and Civil
Supplies, Health and Environment and Forests. The case will again come up for hearing
after four weeks. The genesis of this PIL lay in a letter written by CSE Director, Sunita
Narain on February 5, 2003 to key members of the judiciary informing them about the
findings of the CSE Lab results on pesticide residues in bottled water that raised serious
issues of groundwater and surface water contamination.The letter was turned into a PIL by Justice Dharmadhikari, who was
one of its recipients; the Union of India was made the respondent.
|
AUGUST
24, 2003 |
An article in the Financial Express
reports on the strange and close collaboration between Coke and Pepsi following the CSE
study. The same report adds that in conceding to the JPC, health and family welfare
minister Sushma Swaraj will find it difficult to convince the Opposition that Coca-Cola
and Pepsi did not offer bribes to clear their name.
|
AUGUST
23, 2003 |
According to the Times of India, Nationalist
Congress Party (NCP) leader Sharad Pawar will head a 15-member joint parliamentary
committee (JPC) to examine whether the recent CSE findings on pesticide residues in soft
drinks are correct. The JPC will submit its report by the beginning of winter session.
Meanwhile, doctors and scientists came together at the Centre for Science and Environment
office to discuss the impact on an overall pesticide policy in light 1of the
governments apparent clean-chit to cola companies. Most agreed that that
voluntary norms arent enough, and that there was a need to examine the basic
structure of standards that at present do not exist in the country.
The Times of India reports that a day after
Pepsi took out large advertisements in Delhi newspapers urging consumers to Refresh
your faith
. Now, refresh your thirst, the Maharashtra food and drug
administration served a notice on the company saying four samples collected from the
Khalapur plant in Raigad district contained high levels of pesticide residues.
|
August 21,
2003 |
The
Asian Age reports that the humble nimbu paani, or the more upmarket fresh lime soda
and ice tea are replacing Coke and Pepsi brands across the country. The report says that
outlets in the city have seen a drop in cola sales by more than 50 per cent ever since the
CSE report on pesticides in soft drinks came out. Meanwhile, The Hindustan Times
has reported Pepsi as having announced that it will use only bottled water for its
Fountain Pepsi outlets in India. According to
another report in The Hindustan Times, the Food and Drug Administration,
Maharashtra, has seemingly announced that some soft drinks, such as Thums Up and Limca,
are clear of pesticides. On the other hand, The Asian Age has reported the
Maharashtra government has having defended its decision to raid the Coca-Colas
bottling plant at Pune, claiming the cola giant does not conduct routine tests for
pesticide and insecticide residue.
|
August 19,
2003 |
Yet
another day of tests and counter-tests. Lab tests conducted by the government of Kerala
have apparently not found any traces of pesticides any Coke samples, but the Kerala
government has refrained from issuing a clean chit to the multinational for the time being
(Financial Express). Meanwhile, The
Asian Age reported that the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) would like to apply
European norms for pesticide content in bottled water and soft drinks from next year.
However, it is up to the government to make these standards legally binding. The
Pioneer, on the other hand, reported that BIS may buy time for things to cool down
before deciding on whether soft drinks companies should be asked to adhere to stricter
quality norms after the issue was discussed at a meeting on Monday.
In an article titled Cleaning up at source,
Yoga Rangatia, writing for The Pioneer, hits the nail upon its head by saying that
public discourse on the matter has unfortunately veered towards an anti-multinational
stance instead of looking at the main issue, that of groundwater contamination.
|
August 11,
2003 |
Delhi
High Court asks government to set up an expert committee and come up with results of tests
in 3 weeks. It also asked the government to review the standards for soft drinks, and
include pesticide norms comparable to the rest of the world.
PepsiCo says in court that they will not press charges and allegations made by them in
their petition against the CSE report for now.
|
August 8, 2003 |
Pepsi files petition in High Court alleging CSE study was unreliable and
motivated, and calling for the establishment of an expert committee to review the
pesticide levels. It also seeks a gagging order for CSE, by asking the court not to permit
the organisation to publish further material, and remove the information from its website.
Coca-Cola moves Mumbai High Court to quash an order of the state FDA prohibiting the sale
of soft drinks manufactured in its Pune plant.
|
August 8,
2003 |
Orissa
government orders tests of soft drinks samples by available facilities in the state and
ICMR, Kolkata and Ahmedabad.
Food and Drug Administration, Nagpur, bans distribution of Pepsi and Coke products as a
"precautionary measure". The soft drinks were banned from leaving the premises
of the bottling plants pending laboratory analysis of the products. Samples were collected
and sent to a laboratory in Pune for testing.
West Bengal health department decides to test samples at the Public Health Laboratory and
Salt Lake laboratory of the WBPCB.
Karnataka state government announces intention to test soft drink samples.
Gujarat government also collects samples for testing from plants in Bharauch, Ahmedabad
and Rajkot.
Andhra Pradesh government announces intention to do 'random testing' of soft drinks.
|
August
7, 2003 |
Dr
SP Vasi Reddy, director, VIMTA Labs, tells the media that he has only received two samples
of soft drinks manufactured by PepsiCo for testing in March 2003, but no samples from
Coca-Cola.
|
August 6,
2003 |
Health
minister Sushma Swaraj announces in Parliament that samples have been collected. Samples
of 15 branded soft drinks from Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata and Delhi were subsequently sent
for testing to the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI), Mysore for
testing.
|
August 6,
2003 |
PepsiCo
publishes results of tests carried out by VIMTA Labs, Hyderabad, of samples from plants
producing Aquafina, the bottled water manufactured by the company. In one case, pesticide
residues in treated water are inexplicably higher than in the untreated water. Tests were
carried out only on one bottle of the finished soft drink product.
Data made available by Coca-Cola on the Internet also pertains to Kinley, its bottled
water product.
In both cases, the companies sent samples to the laboratories for testing. This goes
against the norms set down by BIS on how samples should be collected (randomly). For
credible testing, it is also important that the samples are collected, sealed and sent to
the laboratory by an independent external agency, not by the manufacturers
themselves.
|
August 5,
2003 |
PepsiCo
and Coca-Cola convene a joint press conference, where they attack the credibility of CSE's
report, claiming that they get their products tested regularly from VIMTA Labs, Hyderabad,
and TNO Nutrition and Food Research Lab, The Netherlands. No report is made immediately
available however. The CEO's of both companies insinuated legal action against CSE.
|
August 5,
2003 |
CSE releases a report on pesticide
residues found in 12 major cold drink brands sold in and around Delhi.
The report pointed out that the regulations for soft drinks industry were much weaker,
even compared to bottled water. Neither the PFA nor the Fruit Products Order (FPO) - aimed
at regulating food standards in India - regulate pesticide levels in soft drinks.
The report pointed out that even more shockingly, there are no standards to define 'clean'
or 'potable' water in India. In 1996, a parliamentary committee on subordinate legislation
had suggested that water quality should be regulated just as food quality is, but the
Ministry of Urban Development opposed the idea, saying this would impose a legal
commitment to adhere to standards. Agencies providing water could not adhere to these
standards, the ministry claimed, due to lack of financial resources.
The CSE report called on the government to put in place legally enforceable water quality
standards.
|
July 14,
2003 |
MOHFW issues the notification for
bottled water.
|
July 9, 2003 |
BIS holds
another meeting to discuss the appropriate testing methodologies to enforce the proposed
standards. A choice between USEPA method and Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC) was
agreed on.
|
April 7,
2003 |
The central committee on food standards
unanimously decides to recommend EU norms to the health ministry.
|
March 25,
2003 |
Reddy committee report submitted to
Sharad Yadav, minister of consumer affairs.
|
March
14, 2003 |
Almost
20 bottled water units across the country lose ISI mark.
|
February 20,
2003 |
Heath
minister, Sushma Swaraj announces notifying new standards by April 1.
|
February 18,
2003 |
The
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) issues a draft notification on pesticide
residues in bottled water under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (PFA).
|
February 9, 2003 |
Minister for human resource development and science and technology Murli
Manohar Joshi write to the Prime Minister, stating that scientists and experts of his
department validated the CSE report, and calling for stringent measures. In the letter,
Joshi agreed that the BIS standards are "obviously inadequate".
|
February
8, 2003 |
BIS
convenes a meeting to review the requirement for pesticide standards, and proposes the
adoption of the EU norms on bottled water for India.
|
February
5, 2003 |
The
government set up a high-level investigation to look into the inadequacy of standards for
packaged drinking water, headed by Additional Secretary of the Consumer Affairs
Department, Satwant Kaur Reddy.
|
February 4,
2003 |
CSE
released its report on pesticide in bottled drinking water in India. Analysis of 17 brands
sold in and around Delhi and 13 brands from the Mumbai region and found 5 different
pesticide residues, in levels much higher than the norms prescribed in the European Union
for packaged water.
The report pointed out that EU norms were used because the standards set by the Bureau of
Indian Standards (BIS) were vague and inadequate, merely calling for pesticide levels
"below detectable levels" (which will vary, depending on the technology used to
detect them).
The report also pointed out that the source for the contamination appeared to be the
groundwater used by the companies, which was not treated for pesticides before bottling.
|
|
|
|
|
DOWN TO EARTH |
R E L A T E D S T O R I E S |
|
|
The
science, sociology and politics of ADI
Evolving science and strict safety measures keep
contamination of food by pesticides under check. But not in India... |
|
|
|
Pesticides in bottled water... |
|
|
|
|
Pumping out poisons Arsenic,
fluoride in drinking water... |
|
|
|
|
How industry poisons India's groundwater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A drink too much
Delhi's groundwater is poison |
|
|
|
|