|
|
|
|
Action points decided by the South Asia NGO consultation on
WSSD, organised by CSE in New Delhi on November 22 and 23, 2001
At a meeting held in New Delhi on
November 22 and 23, 2001, Towards WSSD: South Asian Strategies and Priorities, the
following preliminary action points were decided in preparation for the World Summit to
Sustainable Development.
It was agreed that the key challenges facing NGOs in the region in
preparation for WSSD include
Awareness
raising (among policy makers, politicians, media and civil society groups)
Building strong networks
Capacity building on global
issues in the region
Developing political
positions on key issues of concern
The key issues on which political positions are to be developed were
identified by the group, under two separate headings reactive issues, and proactive
issues. While the former would include issues that will definitely be discussed at WSSD,
and on which a regional position is required, the latter are issues of importance to the
region.
Issues
likely to be on the WSSD agenda, to which the group decided to react to, and develop
political positions
- International Environmental Governance (IEGs): Does the world need a new environment
organization, should United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) be strengthened, or
should status quo remain?
- Negotiations on a forest convention, and an international instrument on freshwater: The
group agreed that suggestions for an international legally-binding instrument on both
issues should be opposed, as both represent resources that should be controlled by local
communities, and not by international negotiations, which are often simply a face for
vested industry interests.
- A global convention on public participation, right to information and access to justice
with regard to environmental matters, along the lines of the Århus Convention negotiated
by the United Nations Economic Commission for Environment ( UNECE). Northern groups are
likely to push for this convention to be adopted on a global scale. The South Asia group
in New Delhi agreed that while such a convention would indeed be desirable, the
international community should not simply adopt the existing convention. This is because
the process of negotiating such a convention gave civil society groups in the North an
unparalleled opportunity to interact with their governments in discussing the importance
of these rights and their implementation, and such an opportunity should also be provided
to Southern groups. Moreover, Southern governments should not be asked to simply ratify a
convention that they have not negotiated, and thus have no ownership of.
- Existing initiatives on poverty, such as those put forward by the World Bank, ADB etc.
Issues of importance to South Asia, on which the
group must develop political positions
- The concept of ecological poverty
, which includes issues such as right
to food, water security, right to employment, ecological regeneration; local and global
democracy; migration to urban areas.
- Global governance
: The importance of developing a system that takes on board
concerns such as equity and democracy; liability and compliance for rich and poor alike
- Trade and globalisation
- Promoting both efficiency and sufficiency
: On the one hand,
the world should develop ways to promote efficient technology. This will require that
developing countries are genuinely help to leapfrog to cleaner technologies,
rather than being asked to make investments in interim technologies that they will later
be asked to replace.
On the other hand, there is a need for promoting
sufficiency i.e. realising that the Earths limited natural
resources allow only for limited use. Therefore, the Earths capacity to provide
these natural resources, and to absorb pollutants such as greenhouse gases, should be
shared equally between rich and poor nations, to ensure that both have an equal chance to
develop. This includes the need for sustainable consumption in the North.
- Urbanisation
: the problems of pollution, natural resource conflicts, and public
health
- Right to information, and public participation
|
|
|
|