Climate change, with its far-reaching impacts on health, agriculture, water resources and
biodiversity, poses one of the biggest environmental threats that the world is currently
faced with. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was one of the
important treaties signed at the Earth Summit held at Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Since
then, evidence in support of human-induced climate change has mounted. The third
assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, released in 2001,
confirmed that human activities had contributed most to global warming in the past 50
years. It also said that the 20th century had seen unusual warming as
temperature increased by about 0.6°c.
Such assessments, however, have done little to instill a sense of urgency that the
existing situation demands. Most industrialised countries, which have contributed most to
the problem, have been largely occupied with finding cheapest possible ways to meet their
commitments under the Kyoto Protocol. But these solutions are not necessarily the best
solutions.
As a result, the Kyoto Protocol as it is a very small step towards protecting
the environment for present and future generations has been further weakened. At
best, it has some political worth, in showing the US that the protocol can live without
it. Countries recently moved closer to implementing the protocol, as finer rules were
agreed upon in November 2001 in Marrakech, Morocco. The protocol, in its present form, is
replete with provisions allowing countries to meet commitments by doing anything apart
from undertaking domestic cuts in fossil fuel use.
Despite this, the Kyoto Protocols entry into force remains elusive, as key
industrialised countries are yet to ratify. However, the hope remains that the protocol
will enter into force in time for the World Summit on Sustainable Development, to be held
in Johannesburg in September 2002.