logo.jpg (2912 bytes)

health_banner.jpg


     

July-Aug & Sept-Oct 2002
download.gif (450 bytes)


 
news_home.jpg
editorial1.gif
lead_story.jpg
briefs.jpg
book_review.jpg
campaign.jpg
letters.jpg
memory.jpg
news_arcive.jpg
writetous.jpg
health_home.jpg
cse_home.jpg

in_memory.gif

 
previous1.gif

may_june.jpg

DOUBLE INDEMNITY
The US and other developed countries banned the use of DDT in the ’70s because of its alarming toxicity and possiblecarcinogenicity.

More...

line3.gif (67 bytes)
editorial.jpg

lead_story1.gif (1644 bytes)

H E A L T H    S T A T I S T I C S

This Diwali, there was definitely more focus in the media on the pollution from crackers – noise and air. But paradoxically, there was also, definitely as much or even more pollution, in most cities on this night. Delhi, in most parts, the air was foul. The noise was deafening. Why was there no change? Why, when school children have been vocal in their advocacy against noise pollution from crackers, governments have made the right noises about banning crackers? Why is there no perceptible impact of these actions?

The reason simply is that we do not consider that health is of any concern. It is still not on the public agenda. Therefore, it becomes easy, too easy, for the vested interests to ensure that any efforts to curtail pollution are stymied and killed. Take the case of firecrackers. There is a huge and equally vocal lobby operating to support a dirty and noxious industry. The lobby works overtime, first to ensure that the regulations for noise levels is diluted, then to ensure that the regulations are toothless. Not worth the paper they are written on because there is no implementation.

The Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) notified noise standards for firecrackers way back in 1999 after an expert committee, headed by M L Munjal of the Indian Institute of Science examined the issue. It commissioned the
National Physical Laboratory                             more.gif

01.jpg (18240 bytes)

Death by numbers

Statistics (or the lack of it) leads to mismatched budgets, creates inequities and skews up health priorities
line_2.gif (58 bytes)
Strategies can evolve only when data is presented into information to forecast scenarios
line_2.gif (58 bytes)

Does the number of children who die before their first birthday decrease each year? How many children don’t get a square meal in India? Do malaria, dengue, cholera, leprosy and other forgettable diseases occur only in pockets sporadically every other year? Is AIDS undercontrol or is it increasing everywhere in India uniformly? All these answers are provided by statistics.
Statistics give a snapshot of

 line4.gif

societal trends, influencing and shaping public opinion and defining to a very large extent how a government will act. But can these numbers be trusted? Are they as objective as they are thought to be or can they be manipulated to serve a particular subjective interest? How can one spot bad statistics? How often are statistics concocted in the backrooms of hospitals and shady government offices? When do statistics become unreliable?                                    more.gif


past.gif (491 bytes)


CHILDREN AT RISK      ASTHMA    
POVERTY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT