CSE STATEMENT ON PETROL PRICE HIKE
PRICING TO KILL
The ever widening gap between prices of petrol and diesel will encourage the use of
diesel, and result in killing thousands more due to air pollution, says the Centre for
Science and Environment
The Union budget for 1998--99 is out with a mandate to kill. The Centre
for Science and Environment expresses deep anger at the recent price hike in petrol
without corresponding increase in prices of diesel as this will make dirty diesel more
attractive and aid in dieselisation of cities killing thousands more due to air pollution.
Even though the government has rolled back the original hike of four
rupees, the one rupee hike is still unacceptable as this will further widen the gap
between the prices of diesel and petrol.
Scientific evidence on the carcinogenic effect of toxic particulate
emissions from diesel, particularly the poor quality diesel produced in India, has
bypassed the planning pundits completely. Diesel fumes are more dangerous than what was
previously thought. Recent reports from the USEPA show that diesel engines emit almost 100
times more particulate matter than gasoline engines. Scientists in Japan have also
isolated a deadly compound in diesel fumes which is known to be the strongest carcinogen
known till now. Scientists in the Central Pollution Control Board in India inform that the
relative contribution of diesel vehicles to pollution load is higher than petrol vehicles.
There is a complete lack of concerted effort on the part of the
concerned ministries of Finance, Environment and Forests, Petroleum and Natural Gas and
Surface Transport to address the environmental fall out of the fuel pricing policy which
is leading to skewed growth in diesel consumption in the automotive sector and more deadly
toxic fumes in the urban ambience endangering public health.
The myth attached to the government policy to keep diesel prices cheap,
ostensibly to help agricultural poor and to avoid adulteration of diesel with subsidised
kerosene, has long been exploded. The biggest benefactor of the cheap diesel and
subsidised kerosene are the urban consumers. While the transport sector uses 70 per cent
of the diesel produced in the country, urban population use 70 per cent of the kerosene
meant for the rural poor. Even the argument that the diesel should be cheaper to keep
freight cost low does not augur well. Freight movement by road is more energy inefficient
and polluting than the rail transport. In 1970-71, 66 per cent of freight traffic was by
rail. This has fell to 47 per cent by 1991-92 thanks to cheap diesel.
CSE takes serious note of the fact that the pricing policy on fuel is
only providing fiscal incentive to the private vehicle sector to go for more diesel models
for upper class mobility. All automobile majors in India are clamouring to introduce more
diesel cars. Maruti Udyog Limited, joint venture of Mitsubishi and Hindustan Motors,
Premier Automobile Limited, Mercedez Benz, Ford Escorts are all producing diesel lines.
TELCO which is venturing for the first time into personal vehicle segment has already
introduced 1400cc diesel Indica Mint.
This dieselisation of cities is poised to take off based on extremely
dirty diesel produced in India. Indian diesel is one of the dirtiest in terms of sulphur
content which contributes linearly to toxic particulate formation. Sulphur content in
Indian diesel today is 0.5 per cent. After much haggling the ministry of petroleum and
Natural Gas has conceded to meet extremely lax standard of only 0.25 per cent by the year
2000 for the entire country while the rest of the world is moving fast towards 0.001 per
cent level. The Indian diesel with 0.25 per cent sulphur cannot make any impact on the air
quality in view of the current pace of the motorisation and the rate of annual increase in
diesel consumption at 7 to 8 per cent.
CSE has already reported the trend in mortality and morbidity due to
very high level of suspended particulate matter in Indian cities. While World Bank study
has reported that about 40,000 deaths in 36 Indian cities due to air pollution in 1991-92,
a subsequent calculation done by CSE has shown that the death count has increased by
almost 30 per cent by 1995. Studies have indicated that more than 40 per cent of the small
particulate which kills come from vehicular sources and the sulphur level in diesel is the
major precursor to these tiny killers.
The new budget seems even more myopic as it has failed to see how such
concessions on products like paraxylene meant to pamper big business in synthetic yarn
industry is likely to impact upon vehicular emissions. The import duty on paraxylene, a
product from petrochemical plants and an important input for synthetic fibres and yarn,
has been drastically cut from 15 per cent to 5 per cent. This is potentially dangerous
because derivative of naphtha such as this can be used to adulterate automotive fuel. This
can lead to more toxic aromatics in the air.
CSE therefore demands that the government should immediately
rationalise its pricing policy on fuel in the interest of public health.
For additional information contact Anumita Roychowdhury at CSE, 91-11-6983394,
6981110