ECOLOGICAL NEGLECT WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, SAYS
JASWANT SINGH
Developing countries should recognise ecological neglect as a weapon of
mass destruction, and take active part in international negotiations on the environment,
Jaswant Singh, Indian external affairs minister, said at a meeting on international
environmental politics in New Delhi yesterday. He remarked that so far, developing
countries had reduced global environmental negotiations to simplicity, seeing them simply
as a trade-off for money.
Singh was reacting to a presentation by Anil Agarwal, director of the
Centre for Science and Environment (CSE), based on Green Politics, a recent
publication that provides the first-ever comprehensive South perspective on the impact of
global environmental governance on developing countries. Agarwal pointed out that neither
the leaders of rich nor poor countries are willing to provide good leadership to deal with
global ecological problems, such as climate change, depletion of the ozone layer and the
loss of biodiversity.
Instead, while Northern countries focus simply on protecting their
economic and business interests, Southern countries are happy so long as they get
financial and technology transfers. Leaders in the South do not realise that global
environmental negotiations are essentially about the sharing of the Earth's ecological
space, and unless they get their fair share at these negotiations, they would have to
compromise economic development in the future.
For instance, the current per capita emissions of carbon dioxide differ
dramatically in different countries. The per capita emissions of one US citizen in 1996
were equal to those of 19 Indians. This is a direct result of the higher GDP, and hence
the higher consumption patterns of the US. Given that the Earth's 'ecological space' to
absorb these harmful emissions is limited, the climate convention must call upon US
citizens to harness their emissions, while allowing space for developing countries to
increase their emissions as they strive towards economic development.
Singh said the negotiating strategy of developing countries has been
reduced to simplicity and they currently only see international ecological issues as a
trade-off for money. One of the reasons for this was because global environmental issues
are never on the political agenda in Southern countries. "There is not sufficient
vote in issues of ecology and wildlife. These issues do not have enough political sex
appeal and hence political consciousness on these issues does not exist," he said.
Singh was emphatic is rejecting the World Trade Organisation as the
body for settling environmental disputes. "I do not accept that non-tariff issues can
be put on the agenda of such an organisation," he said.
Singh said reports like Green Politics would go a long way in
building awareness and political pressure in developing countries on these issues. Green
Politics has been launched in 17 cities around the world. The purpose of the launches
was to disseminate the South perspective on global environmental politics. Since it was
released, the book has been included as a course book in three universities in the US. The
book covers:
- 3 environmental conventions (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Convention on
Biological Diversity, and the UN Convention to Combat Desertification)
- 4 ongoing negotiations (on an internationally binding instrument for implementing
international action on certain persistent organic pollutants, negotiations for a forest
convention, trade and environment linkages under the WTO, and negotiations for a
multilateral agreement for investments), and
- 2 institutions (the Global Environmental Facility and the UN agenda on the environment).