|
PESTICIDES IN BOTTLED WATER & SOFT DRINKS: CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS
In
February, we released a study on pesticide residues in bottled water. We received a large
number of letters, e-mails and messages from across the country asking us, if what we had
found in bottled water was correct, then what about soft drinks? Tests
carried out by CSE's Pollution Monitoring Laboratory found deadly insecticides in 12
leading brands of cold drinks. The
CSE exposé has generated tremendous media and public interest. Here is a day-to-day
update on media coverage, government reactions and industry response
|
October 21,
2003 |
The Tribune, The Financial Express and The
Statesman report the JPCs meeting with representatives of FICCI, CII and
ASSOCHAM. The reiterated the industrys plea to adopt national norms based on Indian
conditions and ground realities instead of EU norms. They said EU norms were impractical
and would affect the domestic agriculture, food industry and exports. Sharad Pawar said
even though they were open to hearing the two cola companies they had not expressed any
wish to depose before the JPC. HE also said that they would be visiting the Mysore and
Kolkata laboratories and the Coca-Cola plant in Plachimada where a popular agitation is
going on against the over use ground water. The JPC has also decided to ask the Union
health minister Sushma Swaraj to depose before it.
|
October 20,
2003 |
JPC today questioned the government accredited
laboratories, CFTRI and CFL as to why pesticide residues were not detected in soft drinks
before the CSE published its report, whereas the labs found pesticides in the samples sent
by the health ministry. Officials of the two labs told the JPC that they were not the same
samples as that tested by CSE. JPC Chair, Sharad Pawar, told The Free Press Journal,
Deccan Chronicle, The Indian Express and Deccan Herald that it had
the option of calling CSE again for further clarifications. JPC will also see what powers
it had to act against the advertisements of the soft drinks claiming they were safe, even
though the JPC was looking into the issue. It may also visit the bottling plants of both
Coca-Cola and Pepsi, from where samples maybe taken and tested independently before the
verdict is given.
|
October 20,
2003 |
According to coverage in The Pioneer, the
Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore (CFTRI), and the Central Food
Laboratory, Kolkata (CFL), have said there is no reason to doubt the methodology used by
CSE to detect pesticides. The two labs told the JPC that the CSE had used standard
methodology to detect pesticide residues.
|
October 16,
2003 |
Coca-Cola told the US regulator Securities Exchange
Commission that the allegations of pesticide residues in its soft drinks by CSE were
false, the Business Standard reported. It however admitted that the allegations had
adversely affected its sales in July-September. In addition, poor demand in Japan caused
Asia sales to grow only by one per cent as compare to 9 per cent in the corresponding
quarter of last year.
|
October 10,
2003 |
CSE deposes before the Joint Parliamentary Committee,
which was widely covered by Business Standard, The Indian Express, Deccan
Herald. In its presentation, CSE said that in addition to pesticides in soft drinks,
their dangerous levels in food and water is an area of concern. The bottled water used in
the soft drinks was not regulated and there was a need for a stringent policy for the safe
use of pesticides. CSE Director Sunita Narain suggested prescribing different standards
for nutritional products like milk and fruit juices and non-nutritional products like soft
drinks. Chairman Sharad Pawar said that the CSE presentation was impressive,
but the veracity of the report has to be analyzed by experts. He also said that the JPC
had requested the Lok Sabha Speaker for three experts, as the reports were too technical.
The JPC also expressed doubts over the report being tabled in the winter session.
|
October 9,
2003 |
Representatives of the Ministries of health, food
processing, the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) and the Agriculture and Processed Food
Products Export Development Authority deposed before the JPC, according to coverage in Business
Line and The Hindu. The Health ministry was queried on the reason for issuing
draft pesticide residue norms for packaged beverages and whether the ministry had
consulted World Health Organization and Codex norms. JPC Chair Sharad Pawar was quoted as
saying that the health ministry had not consulted any of the advisory groups that it
should have before issuing the draft notification. He also said that food processing
ministry and the APEDA said that EU norms applied in India would affect the farmers and
the food processing industry. They said a large number of units in the country will not be
able to meet the stringent norms and this will also affect the exports of processed food
products. Meanwhile the health ministry has deferred its notification on revised norms for
pesticides residues till the end of December.
|
October 3,
2003 |
Union minister for food processing N T Shanmuhgam goes
on another inspection of a bottler, Varun beverages, in Koshi Kalan, Uttar Pradesh. Two
bottles of Pepsi manufactured in 1995 and 1996 are seized as they do not have the
declaration contains no fruit juice, violating the Fruit Products Order 1955, an article
in The Financial Express reports.
|
October 1,
2003 |
According to reports in Central Chronicle and
Business Line, the Delhi high court stayed the government notification requiring
companies to print their manufacturing date, best before date, and contains no fruit
declaration on the body of the glass bottles than on the caps. Hindustan Coca-Cola
beverages, along with its bottlers and shareholders, had petitioned the high court seeking
to refrain the authorities from taking steps to compel them to destroy the existing stocks
of empty bottles, pleading for more time to phase out the old stock.Meanwhile,
an article Business Line reports that the beverage industry has started a
misinformation campaign claiming that the draft notification of the health ministry, which
applies EU norms for water on finished products, will have several implications, and that
most products in India will not be able to meet these tough standards. The Cola majors
also claim that these standards will be tough to follow and legalizing them in India would
be unprecedented and counter to international norms.
|
September
30, 2003 |
The Indian Express and the New Indian
Express reported that many shops in Chennai were selling bottles of soft drinks that
had long crossed the best before use date by offering huge discounts. The two litre
bottles, which normally cost Rs 40 were being sold for Rs 15 and even below. Meanwhile, Business
Standard reports Pepsi Co claims that the consumer confidence is returning, with sales
returning to pre-controversy levels. Media reports say that sales fallen 30 per cent after
the CSE report.
|
September
22, 2003 |
The Delhi High Court deferred the hearing on the
petition filed by PepsiCo India challenging CSEs report that soft drinks had
pesticide residues, according to a Business Line article. The hearing has been
deferred till October 28 as both Pepsi and CSE wanted more time to file their replies.
|
September
21, 2003 |
The Hindu reports Union minister of state
for food processing inspected the various sections of the Pepsi soft drinks plant at
Mamandoor in Kancheepuram district for nearly two hours. He said he had taken samples of
various Pepsi drinks and sent them for testing at Chennai and Mysore laboratories.
|
September
19, 2003 |
According to The Financial Express, the
government is planning to get an independent evaluation of Coke and Pepsi plants in the
vicinity of the Yamuna River in Delhi to check if these units are causing any adverse
environmental impact. The issue was discussed with the companies after it was alleged that
sludge from plants in Kerala had toxins that could affect human health.
|
September
17, 2003 |
The Delhi High Court has stayed the governments
decision to destroy empty glass bottles of Coca-Cola not having the mandatory embossed
declaration "sweetened aerated water, contains no fruit juice". According to The
Economic Times, the court issued notice to the ministry of food processing industries
to reply to the companys allegations that governments direction to destroy
empty glass bottles lying segregated in various plants in the country is illegal.
|
September
16, 2003 |
The Indian Express, The Asian Age, Business
Standard covered the first meeting of the Joint Parliamentary Committee. The JPC
decided to involve experts to study the issue and invited suggestions from NGOs, industry
representatives, farmers, medical professionals, and toxicologists and any other
interested party. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research chief Dr R A Mashelkar
made a presentation to the JPC giving an overview of the issue. The JPC members also
witnessed the presentations of the scientists from the CFTRI and the CFL. Speaking to
reporters, the chairman of the JPC said that it would request the Speaker formally for
three experts: G Thyagarajan, N K Agnihotri, and S K Khanna. The next meeting was
scheduled for October 9. The committee members also raised objections to the health
ministry draft notification, which had set stringent standards for fruit juices and cost
drinks. The committee said that the health ministry notification be kept aside till the
JPC had formulated its own view on the issue.
|
September
15, 2003 |
The government is planning to make statutory warning
mandatory for all soft drinks producers. An article in The Economic Times reports
that the warning will have information on caffeine and number of calories the drink
carries. Diet Coke and Pepsi will have a warning that it is not safe for children.
According to the ministry for food processing, the draft notification is ready.
|
September
12, 2003 |
Avtar Singh Bhadhana, a Lok Sabha MP and a member of
the Joint Parliamentary Committee, has served a legal notice to the Coca-Cola and Pepsi
offices in India and their headquarters. He has asked them to immediately stop their sales
in India or else face a $10 billion suit on grounds of causing health hazards.
|
September
10, 2003 |
A Deccan Chronicle report says that the Andhra
Pradesh government under pressure from the cola giants, has moderated its pace on
laboratory tests of soft drinks samples collected from various parts of the state. It has
directed the Institute of Preventive Medicine to collect samples of soft drinks of both
Coca-Cola and Pepsi and test them for chemical, biological, bacteriological and pesticide
residues. But the tests are yet to start even a month after the samples had been
collected.
|
September 5,
2003 |
The Bureau of Indian
Standards (BIS) raided a Delhi plant of bottled water that was picking up bottles of
branded water, filling them with water and selling them under fake ISI mark of quality.
Although fake bottling plants were previously reported, in Kanpur and Pun, BIS is only now
realizing how widespread the problem is. According to The Times of India, Union
food and consumer affairs minister Sharad Yadav ordered the BIS to conduct raids in
various parts of the country to prevent further misuseMeanwhile,
Business Line reports that Coca-Cola in a press release said that the Gujarat
government has cleared 17 samples of Coca-Cola taken from various parts of the state,
after they tested negative for pesticides like Lindane, Chlorpyrifos, and DDT. The samples
were tested at the Food and Drugs Laboratory in Vadodara.
|
September 4,
2003 |
Maharashtra Food And
Drug Administration has decided to forward its report on tests conducted on soft drinks to
determine pesticide residues to the Joint Parliamentary Committee, The Free Press
Journal reported. The minister Anil Deshmukh said that the results had been received
and they show variable percentage of pesticide residues in the products, with Pepsi
containing Lindane above global norms.Meanwhile,
Kolkata mayor Subrata Mukherjee will sue the Diamond Beverages for publishing the Kolkata
Municipal Corporation report clearing the soft drinks samples tested by it, The
Statesman reports. Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act 1956, the test report
of any beverage or food cannot be published by the authority against which charges are
brought.
|
September 3,
2003 |
Newstime reports
that samples of Coca-Cola and Pepsi tested at the Vimta laboratory had pesticides below
detectable limits, according to the Hyderabad-based Medically Aware and Responsible
Citizens of Hyderabad (MARCH). Its chairman, Dr Bhargava, however, also said that 75-100
samples tested across the country by NGOs and the Union government were enough to order
the two soft drinks majors to pack their bags. With
the norms for bottled water becoming effective from January 1, 2004, all food testing
laboratories will also have to upgrade their testing facilities to meet European standards
on bottled water and beverages. Laboratory officials are expecting a rise in their costs
that can go up to crores or rupees. The 34 food testing laboratories under the ministry of
science and technology and accredited to the National Accreditation Board for Testing and
Calibration Laboratories will have to upgrade, according to The Statesman.
|
September 1,
2003 |
An article in The
Telegraph reports on the cracks in the unity between the two soft drinks majors. The
Delhi high court restrained Coca-Cola from airing its ad campaign featuring Salman Khan,
saying they were intended to depict Pepsi as inferior. The court however refused to admit
Pepsis plea that the use of an object similar to its logo in the Coca-Cola ad
amounted to an infringement of the trademark and copyright law. Coke and Pepsi officials were called by the West Bengal
Environment Ministry, The Statesman reported. Environment minister Manab Mukherjee
informed the chief minister that he was not satisfied by the responses of the companies on
the presence of lead and cadmium in the sludge collected from a bottling plant at Diamond
Harbour Road. The companies had been given 10 days time to clarify, but their reply was
not satisfactory.
|
AUGUST
30, 2003 |
According to reports in The
Financial Express, The Pioneer, The Assam Tribune, and The Times of
India, the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has issued a draft amendment
notification of the Prevention of Food Adulteration rules of 1955, dated August 26, to
regulate the presence of metals, and pesticides in beverages, fish and other food
products. It proposes to extend the norms for pesticide residues in bottled water to all
kinds of beverages including soft drinks. 30 days have been given for objections or
suggestion before a confirmatory is issued.Meanwhile,
reports in The Tribune, The New Indian Express, The Hindu note that the Central
Science Laboratory in Britain has found soft drinks safe for human consumption after
testing two bottles each of Coca-Cola and Pepsi. The lab said that out of the 35
pesticides tested, it did not find traces of 31 at or above the EU norms. The tests were
commissioned by the newsmagazine Outlook, which picked up samples from the Safdarjung
Enclave area of South Delhi. Coca-Coal India claimed that it had got a clean chit from the
laboratory.
In another development, The Statesman reports that the green bench of the
Kolkata high court heard two separate petitions for banning the sales of the soft drinks.
One of the petitioners, Subhas Dutta said that the ingredients of these soft drinks namely
caffeine, phosphorus, and excess sugar were hazardous and were not known to the consumers.
The court has directed its office to issue notices to the respondents.
|
AUGUST
29, 2003 |
The green bench of the
Kolkata High Court admitted a public interest litigation to demanding the state pollution
control board to make public test results of the soft drinks samples analyzed for toxins.
Both the board and the environment minister had said that their reports would not be
disclosed, but sent to the Centre and the state health department.
|
AUGUST
28, 2003 |
Hindustan Times reports
that the test results of the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI),
Mysore, and the Central Food Laboratory (CFL), Kolkata were made public. The tests
revealed that the samples of both Coke and Pepsi contained levels of pesticides like
Lindane and DDT that were higher than permissible EU norms. DDT was 12 times higher than
the EU norms in 58 per cent of the samples. Lindane was found in all the samples and was
higher than EU norms in 33 per cent of the samples. Chlorpyrifos was also found in all the
samples and exceeded EU norms in 75 per cent samples. Blue Pepsi had pesticide residues
5.2 times higher than the EU standards, the highest levels in all samples of all brands.
While Pepsi, Diet Pepsi and Limca cleared the EU bar. The labs in a joint report also said
that since the samples tested by them were not from the same batch as CSE samples, the two
reports were not comparable.
|
AUGUST
27, 2003 |
The Financial Express
reports that the Union Ministry for Health and Family Welfare have decided to
promulgate an ordinance to categorise water as a food item and fix enforceable safety
standards for drinking water under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The proposal
will be put before the Union cabinet for approval. This will mean that all agencies
responsible for providing drinking water will have to adhere to these norms. Health
Minister Sushma Swaraj also said that the detailed reports of the test results of the 12
brands of soft drinks would be made public tomorrow.Meanwhile
in Rajasthan, a petitioner has challenged the test results of the samples tested by the
State Central Public Health Laboratory, Jaipur, which shows no microbial contamination.
|
AUGUST
27, 2003 |
The Nepal government
announced that the Coca-Cola and Pepsi samples tested for pesticide residues are within
safety levels for consumption, the Kathmandu Post reported.
|
AUGUST
25, 2003 |
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare seeks an
"unconditional apology" from Pepsi, after the company used the Health minister
Sushma Swarajs name in an advertisement claiming that the minister had given a clean
to Pepsi. The advertisement had quoted the minister as saying "all these (soft
drinks) are well within safety limits".The Mumbai High Court sets aside an order
by the Maharashtra Food and Drugs Administration prohibiting the sales and purchase of a
batch of soft drinks from the Pune plant of Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages, saying that the
product confirmed to the standards set by the PFA Rules 1955. This order was issued after
the court received the public analysts reports of seven samples of Coke, Limca,
Thums Up and Sprite, which had pesticide residues below European standards.
|
AUGUST
25, 2003 |
A public interest litigation was filed suo moto
in the Supreme Court (SC) today on behalf of the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).
The SC issued notices to the Union ministries of Food and Civil Supplies, Health and
Environment and Forests. The case will again come up for hearing after four weeks. The
genesis of this PIL lay in a letter written by CSE Director, Sunita Narain on February 5,
2003 to key members of the judiciary informing them about the findings of the CSE Lab
results on pesticide residues in bottled water that raised serious issues of groundwater
and surface water contamination.The
letter was turned into a PIL by Justice Dharmadhikari, who was one of its recipients; the
Union of India was made the respondent.
|
AUGUST
24, 2003 |
An article in the Financial Express reports
on the strange and close collaboration between Coke and Pepsi following the CSE study. The
same report adds that in conceding to the JPC, health and family welfare minister Sushma
Swaraj will find it difficult to convince the Opposition that Coca-Cola and Pepsi did not
offer bribes to clear their name.
|
AUGUST
23, 2003 |
According to the Times of India, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP)
leader Sharad Pawar will head a 15-member joint parliamentary committee (JPC) to examine
whether the recent CSE findings on pesticide residues in soft drinks are correct. The JPC
will submit its report by the beginning of winter session.
Meanwhile, doctors and scientists came together at the Centre for Science and Environment
office to discuss the impact on an overall pesticide policy in light 1of the
governments apparent clean-chit to cola companies. Most agreed that that
voluntary norms arent enough, and that there was a need to examine the basic
structure of standards that at present do not exist in the country.
The Times of India reports that a day after
Pepsi took out large advertisements in Delhi newspapers urging consumers to Refresh
your faith
. Now, refresh your thirst, the Maharashtra food and drug
administration served a notice on the company saying four samples collected from the
Khalapur plant in Raigad district contained high levels of pesticide residues.
|
August 21,
2003 |
The Asian Age
reports that the humble nimbu paani, or the more upmarket fresh lime soda and ice tea are
replacing Coke and Pepsi brands across the country. The report says that outlets in the
city have seen a drop in cola sales by more than 50 per cent ever since the CSE report on
pesticides in soft drinks came out. Meanwhile, The Hindustan Times has reported
Pepsi as having announced that it will use only bottled water for its Fountain Pepsi
outlets in India. According to another report in
The Hindustan Times, the Food and Drug Administration, Maharashtra, has seemingly
announced that some soft drinks, such as Thums Up and Limca, are clear of pesticides. On
the other hand, The Asian Age has reported the Maharashtra government has having
defended its decision to raid the Coca-Colas bottling plant at Pune, claiming the
cola giant does not conduct routine tests for pesticide and insecticide residue.
|
August 19,
2003 |
Yet another day of tests
and counter-tests. Lab tests conducted by the government of Kerala have apparently not
found any traces of pesticides any Coke samples, but the Kerala government has refrained
from issuing a clean chit to the multinational for the time being (Financial Express).
Meanwhile, The Asian Age reported that the
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) would like to apply European norms for pesticide content
in bottled water and soft drinks from next year. However, it is up to the government to
make these standards legally binding. The Pioneer, on the other hand, reported that
BIS may buy time for things to cool down before deciding on whether soft drinks companies
should be asked to adhere to stricter quality norms after the issue was discussed at a
meeting on Monday.
In an article titled Cleaning up at source,
Yoga Rangatia, writing for The Pioneer, hits the nail upon its head by saying that
public discourse on the matter has unfortunately veered towards an anti-multinational
stance instead of looking at the main issue, that of groundwater contamination.
|
August 11,
2003 |
Delhi High Court asks
government to set up an expert committee and come up with results of tests in 3 weeks. It
also asked the government to review the standards for soft drinks, and include pesticide
norms comparable to the rest of the world.
PepsiCo says in court that they will not press charges and allegations made by them in
their petition against the CSE report for now.
|
August 8, 2003 |
Pepsi files petition in High Court alleging CSE study was unreliable and
motivated, and calling for the establishment of an expert committee to review the
pesticide levels. It also seeks a gagging order for CSE, by asking the court not to permit
the organisation to publish further material, and remove the information from its website.
Coca-Cola moves Mumbai High Court to quash an order of the state FDA prohibiting the sale
of soft drinks manufactured in its Pune plant.
|
August 8,
2003 |
Orissa government orders
tests of soft drinks samples by available facilities in the state and ICMR, Kolkata and
Ahmedabad.
Food and Drug Administration, Nagpur, bans distribution of Pepsi and Coke products as a
"precautionary measure". The soft drinks were banned from leaving the premises
of the bottling plants pending laboratory analysis of the products. Samples were collected
and sent to a laboratory in Pune for testing.
West Bengal health department decides to test samples at the Public Health Laboratory and
Salt Lake laboratory of the WBPCB.
Karnataka state government announces intention to test soft drink samples.
Gujarat government also collects samples for testing from plants in Bharauch, Ahmedabad
and Rajkot.
Andhra Pradesh government announces intention to do 'random testing' of soft drinks.
|
August
7, 2003 |
Dr
SP Vasi Reddy, director, VIMTA Labs, tells the media that he has only received two samples
of soft drinks manufactured by PepsiCo for testing in March 2003, but no samples from
Coca-Cola.
|
August 6,
2003 |
Health minister Sushma
Swaraj announces in Parliament that samples have been collected. Samples of 15 branded
soft drinks from Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata and Delhi were subsequently sent for testing to
the Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI), Mysore for testing.
|
August 6,
2003 |
PepsiCo publishes
results of tests carried out by VIMTA Labs, Hyderabad, of samples from plants producing
Aquafina, the bottled water manufactured by the company. In one case, pesticide residues
in treated water are inexplicably higher than in the untreated water. Tests were carried
out only on one bottle of the finished soft drink product.
Data made available by Coca-Cola on the Internet also pertains to Kinley, its bottled
water product.
In both cases, the companies sent samples to the laboratories for testing. This goes
against the norms set down by BIS on how samples should be collected (randomly). For
credible testing, it is also important that the samples are collected, sealed and sent to
the laboratory by an independent external agency, not by the manufacturers
themselves.
|
August 5,
2003 |
PepsiCo and Coca-Cola
convene a joint press conference, where they attack the credibility of CSE's report,
claiming that they get their products tested regularly from VIMTA Labs, Hyderabad, and TNO
Nutrition and Food Research Lab, The Netherlands. No report is made immediately available
however. The CEO's of both companies insinuated legal action against CSE.
|
August 5,
2003 |
CSE releases a report on pesticide residues found in
12 major cold drink brands sold in and around Delhi.
The report pointed out that the regulations for soft drinks industry were much weaker,
even compared to bottled water. Neither the PFA nor the Fruit Products Order (FPO) - aimed
at regulating food standards in India - regulate pesticide levels in soft drinks.
The report pointed out that even more shockingly, there are no standards to define 'clean'
or 'potable' water in India. In 1996, a parliamentary committee on subordinate legislation
had suggested that water quality should be regulated just as food quality is, but the
Ministry of Urban Development opposed the idea, saying this would impose a legal
commitment to adhere to standards. Agencies providing water could not adhere to these
standards, the ministry claimed, due to lack of financial resources.
The CSE report called on the government to put in place legally enforceable water quality
standards.
|
July 14,
2003 |
MOHFW issues the notification for bottled water.
|
July 9, 2003 |
BIS holds another
meeting to discuss the appropriate testing methodologies to enforce the proposed
standards. A choice between USEPA method and Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC) was
agreed on.
|
April 7,
2003 |
The central committee on food standards unanimously
decides to recommend EU norms to the health ministry.
|
March 25,
2003 |
Reddy committee report submitted to Sharad Yadav,
minister of consumer affairs.
|
March
14, 2003 |
Almost
20 bottled water units across the country lose ISI mark.
|
February 20,
2003 |
Heath minister, Sushma
Swaraj announces notifying new standards by April 1.
|
February 18,
2003 |
The Ministry of Health
and Family Welfare (MOHFW) issues a draft notification on pesticide residues in bottled
water under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act (PFA).
|
February 9, 2003 |
Minister for human resource development and science and technology Murli
Manohar Joshi write to the Prime Minister, stating that scientists and experts of his
department validated the CSE report, and calling for stringent measures. In the letter,
Joshi agreed that the BIS standards are "obviously inadequate".
|
February
8, 2003 |
BIS
convenes a meeting to review the requirement for pesticide standards, and proposes the
adoption of the EU norms on bottled water for India.
|
February
5, 2003 |
The
government set up a high-level investigation to look into the inadequacy of standards for
packaged drinking water, headed by Additional Secretary of the Consumer Affairs
Department, Satwant Kaur Reddy.
|
February 4,
2003 |
CSE released its report
on pesticide in bottled drinking water in India. Analysis of 17 brands sold in and around
Delhi and 13 brands from the Mumbai region and found 5 different pesticide residues, in
levels much higher than the norms prescribed in the European Union for packaged
water.
The report pointed out that EU norms were used because the standards set by the Bureau of
Indian Standards (BIS) were vague and inadequate, merely calling for pesticide levels
"below detectable levels" (which will vary, depending on the technology used to
detect them).
The report also pointed out that the source for the contamination appeared to be the
groundwater used by the companies, which was not treated for pesticides before bottling.
|
TOP |
|
|