logo.jpg (2912 bytes)

health_banner.jpg


     

May-June 2002
download.gif (450 bytes)

news_home.jpg
editorial1.gif
lead_story.jpg
reading.jpg
briefs.jpg
book_review.jpg
campaign.jpg
letters.jpg
news_arcive.jpg
health_home.jpg
cse_home.jpg

join.gif
If you are interested in receiving the copy of the newsletter, do write to us. Join our nework.

 

lead_story1.jpg (1699 bytes)

Blind Acceptance
With no strategic vision or surveillance systems in place, it is not possible to prevent outbreaks from becoming epidemics. There is virtually no data for a very prevalent disease like malaria. Although climatic variations, migration, poor access to health facilities and poor civic conditions all contribute to the incidence of malaria, none of these factors are considered when developing malaria control programmes in India.

Around 80 organisations governing thermal power plants, dams, industrial estates and plants, waterways, coal fields and mines lack malaria control programmes. They do, however, significantly damage local ecology, which contributes to outbreaks and epidemics. Those few organisations that have malaria programmes are independent of the national malaria programme. There is no shared vision when it comes to control malaria. Malaria can be controlled if the vector population is reduced using simple bioenvironmental interventions and innovations. Reducing transmission alone can reduce the incidence of malaria substantially.

What may work!
A combination of strategies is the best solution to combat malaria (see table: Ten strategies that can work). Bioenvironmental solutions have worked well wherever they have been implemented.

Ten strategies that can work

Strategy (in order of priority) Feature
Bioenvironmental methodologies: Reduces the length of transmission season and prevalence
People’s participation: Reduces costs of projects and improves control and surveillance
Involvement of other stakeholders: Large industries (thermal power plants, dam projects, mines, industries) contribute significantly to environmental change but are not integrated into the malaria programme
Prophylaxis: Folic acid and vitamin supplements for children and pregnant women improves immunity and reduces infections
Active surveillance: Inter-sectoral collaboration to actively monitor vector populations and outbreaks, and devise specific control strategies
Adopt cost effective strategies: Use of bednets and eliminate vectors during lean seasons
Strict legal enforcement: Responsibilities and accountability of stakeholders, especially local communities, if outbreaks occur or if there is increase in vector populations. Legal action against municipalities and state government possible in cases where epidemics occur due to negligence
Access to medicine: Curative measures should be accessible to communities
Integrate malaria control with other health and development programmes: Will reduce project costs and increase empowerment towards community health
Mix of control strategies: Use biopesticides and reduce dependence on chemical pesticides. Many local innovations reduce vector population
   

In seven villages of Kheda district, Gujarat, the Malaria Research Centre (MRC) successfully introduced bioenvironmental measures, using larvivorous fish and draining stagnant ponds and ditches. Chemical use diminished during subsequent years as few mosquito-breeding sites remained and very few cases were reported. Unfortunately the project was not sustainable, as people were not provided with the capability to take on the project once funds expired. Malaria re-emerged over the subsequent years, and DDT use was resumed. The same is true for Kolar (Karnataka) and Hassan (Tamil Nadu). The MRC withdrew from the project, as there was little political will to support a grassroots innovation. In the Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited (BHEL) complex in Hardwar, there was more political will and motivation to make the bioenvironmental project a success.

Globally, countries like the Solomon Islands, Indonesia, Malaysia, parts of Somalia and Comoros Islands have successfully used bioenvironmental control methods. In China for example, large rice farms required a lot of standing water, which increased the incidence of malaria. To reduce the extent of standing water, farmers now use just enough water to wet the fields on a regular basis. With no standing water, vectors are unable to breed, leading to a 50 per cent reduction in their numbers.

The DDT story may be repeated again with biopesticides. The most potent biopesticide, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has already developed resistance in some mosquito species. Apart from resistance, biopesticides can only be effectively used in clear water bodies, as they lose their potency in dirty sewage and industrial water. This rules out their use in most of India’s stagnant drains and effluent streams.

Other strategies of malaria control include surveillance of vectors, surveillance of susceptible populations, motivating communities to report cases of fevers during malaria seasons, and providing communities with incentives to protect themselves with bednets. Legal instruments to ensure responsibility for control can be taken. Legal action against municipalities and state governments is possible when epidemics occur due to their negligence. Citizens of Ratlam and Bhilwara dragged their respective municipalities to court for neglecting civic amenities. The citizens won the case under the public nuisance act.

Each outbreak and every epidemic is an evolutionary success story for malaria, from oblivion to epidemic proportions. The very least governments can do is to keep a few paces ahead of the disease through constant monitoring, simple hygiene, collective action and some common sense.


References
1 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme 2001, The AMAP Human Health Secretariat, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Denmark, Newsletter.

2 Rashmi Sanghi 2001, Living in a Chemical World-Persistent Organic Pollutants, Resonance, Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore, p 64-73.

3 J P Bourguignon 2001, Sexual precocity after immigration from developing countries to Belgium: evidence of previous exposure to organochlorine pesticides, Human Reproduction, Oxford University Press, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1020-1026.

4 Roger Bate 2000, How environmentalism kills the poor — malaria and the DDT story, Envirobio Conference, Agricultural Sector and Toxicology Group, Paris, November 14, mimeo.

5. R S Sharma et al 1996, Epidemiology and control of malaria in India, NAMP, New Delhi, p220.


Next Page Previous | Defenders of DDT 1 2 3

past.gif (1220 bytes)

 

CHILDREN AT RISK   ASTHMA  
POVERTY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT

email.gif