|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you are interested in receiving the
copy of the newsletter, do write to us. Join our nework. |
|
|
Blind Acceptance
With no strategic vision or surveillance systems in place, it is not possible to
prevent outbreaks from becoming epidemics. There is virtually no data for a very prevalent
disease like malaria. Although climatic variations, migration, poor access to health
facilities and poor civic conditions all contribute to the incidence of malaria, none of
these factors are considered when developing malaria control programmes in India. Around
80 organisations governing thermal power plants, dams, industrial estates and plants,
waterways, coal fields and mines lack malaria control programmes. They do, however,
significantly damage local ecology, which contributes to outbreaks and epidemics. Those
few organisations that have malaria programmes are independent of the national malaria
programme. There is no shared vision when it comes to control malaria. Malaria can be
controlled if the vector population is reduced using simple bioenvironmental interventions
and innovations. Reducing transmission alone can reduce the incidence of malaria
substantially.
What may work!
A combination of strategies is the best solution to combat
malaria (see table: Ten strategies that can work).
Bioenvironmental solutions have worked well wherever they have been implemented.
Ten strategies that can work |
Strategy (in order of priority) |
Feature |
Bioenvironmental methodologies: |
Reduces the length of transmission season and prevalence |
Peoples participation: |
Reduces costs of projects and improves control and
surveillance |
Involvement of other stakeholders: |
Large industries (thermal power plants, dam projects,
mines, industries) contribute significantly to environmental change but are not integrated
into the malaria programme |
Prophylaxis: |
Folic acid and vitamin supplements for children and
pregnant women improves immunity and reduces infections |
Active surveillance: |
Inter-sectoral collaboration to actively monitor vector
populations and outbreaks, and devise specific control strategies |
Adopt cost effective strategies: |
Use of bednets and eliminate vectors during lean seasons |
Strict legal enforcement: |
Responsibilities and accountability of stakeholders,
especially local communities, if outbreaks occur or if there is increase in vector
populations. Legal action against municipalities and state government possible in cases
where epidemics occur due to negligence |
Access to medicine: |
Curative measures should be accessible to communities |
Integrate malaria control with other health and
development programmes: |
Will reduce project costs and increase empowerment towards
community health |
Mix of control strategies: |
Use biopesticides and reduce dependence on chemical
pesticides. Many local innovations reduce vector population |
|
|
In seven villages of Kheda district, Gujarat, the Malaria
Research Centre (MRC) successfully introduced bioenvironmental measures, using larvivorous
fish and draining stagnant ponds and ditches. Chemical use diminished during subsequent
years as few mosquito-breeding sites remained and very few cases were reported.
Unfortunately the project was not sustainable, as people were not provided with the
capability to take on the project once funds expired. Malaria re-emerged over the
subsequent years, and DDT use was resumed. The same is true for Kolar (Karnataka) and
Hassan (Tamil Nadu). The MRC withdrew from the project, as there was little political will
to support a grassroots innovation. In the Bharat Heavy Electrical Limited (BHEL) complex
in Hardwar, there was more political will and motivation to make the bioenvironmental
project a success.
Globally, countries like the Solomon Islands, Indonesia, Malaysia, parts of Somalia and
Comoros Islands have successfully used bioenvironmental control methods. In China for
example, large rice farms required a lot of standing water, which increased the incidence
of malaria. To reduce the extent of standing water, farmers now use just enough water to
wet the fields on a regular basis. With no standing water, vectors are unable to breed,
leading to a 50 per cent reduction in their numbers.
The DDT story may be repeated again with biopesticides. The most potent biopesticide, Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt) has already developed resistance in some mosquito species. Apart
from resistance, biopesticides can only be effectively used in clear water bodies, as they
lose their potency in dirty sewage and industrial water. This rules out their use in most
of Indias stagnant drains and effluent streams.
Other strategies of malaria control include surveillance of vectors, surveillance of
susceptible populations, motivating communities to report cases of fevers during malaria
seasons, and providing communities with incentives to protect themselves with bednets.
Legal instruments to ensure responsibility for control can be taken. Legal action against
municipalities and state governments is possible when epidemics occur due to their
negligence. Citizens of Ratlam and Bhilwara dragged their respective municipalities to
court for neglecting civic amenities. The citizens won the case under the public nuisance
act.
Each outbreak and every epidemic is an evolutionary success story for malaria, from
oblivion to epidemic proportions. The very least governments can do is to keep a few paces
ahead of the disease through constant monitoring, simple hygiene, collective action and
some common sense.
References
1 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme 2001, The
AMAP Human Health Secretariat, Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine,
Denmark, Newsletter.2 Rashmi Sanghi 2001, Living in a Chemical World-Persistent Organic
Pollutants, Resonance, Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore, p 64-73.
3 J P Bourguignon 2001, Sexual precocity after immigration from developing countries to
Belgium: evidence of previous exposure to organochlorine pesticides, Human Reproduction,
Oxford University Press, Vol. 16, No. 5, 1020-1026.
4 Roger Bate 2000, How environmentalism kills the poor malaria and the DDT
story, Envirobio Conference, Agricultural Sector and Toxicology Group, Paris, November 14,
mimeo.
5. R S Sharma et al 1996, Epidemiology and control of malaria in India, NAMP, New
Delhi, p220. |
|
|